May 11, 2016seattlelearner rated this title 2 out of 5 stars
Decent material. Sloppy proofing. Correct content matters and the reader can not know if the mistakes were made in the original text or in typesetting. I glanced at the Chapter 20 Electric fields. On page 217 are at least two mistakes.
Incorrect ( z + a) where (z - a) was intended.
Incorrect (zaz) where (2az) was intended.
These mistakes cost time for the reader and make the reader distrust the text.
I sampled the videos. At present you must provide your email to receive the videos. Objectionable. They should be on a famous video website where they can be shared and rated. They appear to be solving problems in the book. I would rate them 3 of 5 stars. Very ordinary indeed.
Comment
Physics for Engineering and Science